الاقناع والاستدلال الرياضي مقاربة حجاجيّة

Abstract

Argumentation, as a communicative value built on dialogue, carries a persuasive function that is almost inseparable from this environment in all its interactions. They proceed in two parallel lines along the procedural structure. This meaning places the producer of the discourse and its recipient in front of the discourse as a creative trust that makes the two mutations partners in construction and understanding together. The research proceeded in this communicative content to stand on the circumstances of the persuasive influence in argumentative discourses, and how it occurs, and what are the main motives for constructing argumentative texts? What is the nature of the recipient? What are the factors that stand behind the occurrence of influence and persuasion? The research also focused on a dialectical discussion that took place in the communicative path recently, which sees that argumentation and demonstrative reasoning are two different things, neither of which is suitable for working in one fabric due to the structural difference between their functions, which led the research to prove the reciprocal nature between them in terms of usage convergence, and the suitability of argumentative language to adapt the rational demonstrative standard in argumentative inferences despite the usage flexibility that runs in the discourse.